Cognitive Science 36 (4):655-673 (2012)

Abstract
It has been well documented how language-specific cues may be used for word segmentation. Here, we investigate what role a language-independent phonological universal, the sonority sequencing principle (SSP), may also play. Participants were presented with an unsegmented speech stream with non-English word onsets that juxtaposed adherence to the SSP with transitional probabilities. Participants favored using the SSP in assessing word-hood, suggesting that the SSP represents a potentially powerful cue for word segmentation. To ensure the SSP influenced the segmentation process (i.e., during learning), we presented two additional groups of participants with either (a) no exposure to the stimuli prior to testing or (b) the same stimuli with pauses marking word breaks. The SSP did not influence test performance in either case, suggesting that the SSP is important for word segmentation during the learning process itself. Moreover, the fact that SSP-independent segmentation of the stimulus occurred (in the latter control condition) suggests that universals are best understood as biases rather than immutable constraints on learning
Keywords Language universals  Sonority  Sonority sequencing principle  Word segmentation  Phonology
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01211.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,043
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Which Came First: Infants Learning Language or Motherese?Heather Bortfeld - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):505-506.
The Feasibility of Segmentation of Protolanguage.István Zachar - 2011 - Interaction Studies 12 (1):1-35.
Word Extension: A Key to Early Word Learning and Domain-Specificity.Sandra R. Waxman - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1121-1122.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-11-04

Total views
37 ( #304,725 of 2,498,570 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,098 of 2,498,570 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes