Cognitive Science 36 (4):655-673 (2011)
It has been well documented how language-specific cues may be used for word segmentation. Here, we investigate what role a language-independent phonological universal, the sonority sequencing principle (SSP), may also play. Participants were presented with an unsegmented speech stream with non-English word onsets that juxtaposed adherence to the SSP with transitional probabilities. Participants favored using the SSP in assessing word-hood, suggesting that the SSP represents a potentially powerful cue for word segmentation. To ensure the SSP influenced the segmentation process (i.e., during learning), we presented two additional groups of participants with either (a) no exposure to the stimuli prior to testing or (b) the same stimuli with pauses marking word breaks. The SSP did not influence test performance in either case, suggesting that the SSP is important for word segmentation during the learning process itself. Moreover, the fact that SSP-independent segmentation of the stimulus occurred (in the latter control condition) suggests that universals are best understood as biases rather than immutable constraints on learning
|Keywords||Language universals Sonority Sonority sequencing principle Word segmentation Phonology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Myth of Language Universals: Language Diversity and its Importance for Cognitive Science.Nicholas Evans & Stephen C. Levinson - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5):429-448.
The Role of Exposure to Isolated Words in Early Vocabulary Development.Michael R. Brent & Jeffrey Mark Siskind - 2001 - Cognition 81 (2):B33-B44.
The Curse of Knowledge: First Language Knowledge Impairs Adult Learners’ Use of Novel Statistics for Word Segmentation.Amy S. Finn & Carla L. Hudson Kam - 2008 - Cognition 108 (2):477-499.
Production Constraints on Learning Novel Onset Phonotactics.Melissa A. Redford - 2008 - Cognition 107 (3):785-816.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Which Came First: Infants Learning Language or Motherese?Heather Bortfeld - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):505-506.
Phonological Abstraction in Processing Lexical-Tone Variation: Evidence From a Learning Paradigm.Holger Mitterer, Yiya Chen & Xiaolin Zhou - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (1):184-197.
Learning Diphone-Based Segmentation.Robert Daland & Janet B. Pierrehumbert - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (1):119-155.
The Feasibility of Segmentation of Protolanguage.Istvan Zachar - 2011 - Interaction Studies 12 (1):1-35.
A Bayesian Model of Biases in Artificial Language Learning: The Case of a Word‐Order Universal.Jennifer Culbertson & Paul Smolensky - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (8):1468-1498.
Using Variability to Guide Dimensional Weighting: Associative Mechanisms in Early Word Learning.Keith S. Apfelbaum & Bob McMurray - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (6):1105-1138.
Creating the Customer: The Influence of Advertising on Consumer Market Segments – Evidence and Ethics. [REVIEW]Agnes Nairn & Pierre Berthon - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 42 (1):83 - 99.
Which Phonology? Evidence for a Dissociation Between Articulatory and Auditory Phonology From Word-Form Deafness.Giordana Grossi - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):290-291.
Automatic Phonetic Segmentation of Hindi Speech Using Hidden Markov Model.Archana Balyan, S. S. Agrawal & Amita Dev - 2012 - AI and Society 27 (4):543-549.
Looking in the Wrong Direction Correlates With More Accurate Word Learning.Stanka A. Fitneva & Morten H. Christiansen - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (2):367-380.
Word Extension: A Key to Early Word Learning and Domain-Specificity.Sandra R. Waxman - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1121-1122.
Cross-Situational Learning: An Experimental Study of Word-Learning Mechanisms.Kenny Smith, Andrew D. M. Smith & Richard A. Blythe - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (3):480-498.
Tracking the Time Course of Word‐Frequency Effects in Auditory Word Recognition With Event‐Related Potentials.Sophie Dufour, Angèle Brunellière & Ulrich H. Frauenfelder - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (3):489-507.
How Many Mechanisms Are Needed to Analyze Speech? A Connectionist Simulation of Structural Rule Learning in Artificial Language Acquisition.Aarre Laakso & Paco Calvo - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (7):1243-1281.
Added to index2011-11-04
Total downloads16 ( #292,446 of 2,152,478 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,782 of 2,152,478 )
How can I increase my downloads?