The Perils of Parity: Should Citizen Science and Traditional Research Follow the Same Ethical and Privacy Principles?

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (S1):74-81 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The individual right of access to one’s own data is a crucial privacy protection long recognized in U.S. federal privacy laws. Mobile health devices and research software used in citizen science often fall outside the HIPAA Privacy Rule, leaving participants without HIPAA’s right of access to one’s own data. Absent state laws requiring access, the law of contract, as reflected in end-user agreements and terms of service, governs individuals’ ability to find out how much data is being stored and how it might be shared with third parties. Efforts to address this problem by establishing norms of individual access to data from mobile health research unfortunately can run afoul of the FDA’s investigational device exemption requirements.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Privacy and Security Issues with Mobile Health Research Applications.Stacey A. Tovino - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (S1):154-158.
Biobanking Research and Privacy Laws in the United States.Heather L. Harrell & Mark A. Rothstein - 2016 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 44 (1):106-127.
What should IRBs consider when applying the privacy rule to research?Julie Waltz Gerlach - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):299-303.
Privacy exchanges: restoring consent in privacy self-management.Mario Pascalev - 2017 - Ethics and Information Technology 19 (1):39-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-29

Downloads
13 (#1,066,279)

6 months
6 (#587,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?