Co‐Hyperintensionality

Ratio 30 (3):270-287 (2017)
Authors
Federico L. G. Faroldi
University of Ghent
Abstract
Co-hyperintensionality, or hyperintensional equivalence, is a relation holding between two or more contents that can be substituted in a hyperintensional context salva veritate. I argue that two strategies used to provide criteria for co-hyperintensionality fail. I argue that there is no generalized notion of co-hyperintensionality that meets plausible desiderata, by showing that the opposite thesis leads to falsity. As a conclusion, I suggest to take co-hyperintensionality as a primitive and I provide a general criterion of co-hyperintensionality whose content depends on each hyperintensional notion we aim to formalize.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/rati.12143
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 36,586
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Angellic Content.Kit Fine - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (2):199-226.
Truth-Maker Semantics for Intuitionistic Logic.Kit Fine - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3):549-577.
Impossible Worlds: A Modest Approach.Daniel Nolan - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (4):535-572.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Introduction.Marie Duží & Bjørn Jespersen - 2015 - Synthese 192 (3):525-534.
On a Sufficient Condition for Hyperintensionality.Vera Hoffmann-Kolss - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (260):336-354.
Is Transparent Intensional Logic a Non-Classical Logic?Pavel Materna - 2014 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 23 (1):47-55.
Are Impossible Worlds Trivial?Mark Jago - 2013 - In Vit Puncochar & Petr Svarny (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2012. College Publications.
Hyperintensional Metaphysics.Daniel Nolan - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 171 (1):149-160.
Mark Jago: The Impossible: An Essay on Hyperintensionality.Ralf M. Bader - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy 112 (11):627-630.
Hyperintensional Propositions.Mark Jago - 2015 - Synthese 192 (3):585-601.
Constructive Belief Reports.Bartosz Więckowski - 2015 - Synthese 192 (3):603-633.
Intrinsicality and Hyperintensionality.M. Eddon - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):314-336.
Variabilism.Sam Cumming - 2008 - Philosophical Review 117 (4):525-554.
Granularity Problems.Jens Christian Bjerring & Wolfgang Schwarz - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (266):22-37.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-07-15

Total downloads
38 ( #171,881 of 2,303,716 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #97,770 of 2,303,716 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature