Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration
Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):173-178 (2005)
Abstract
The professional regulatory system known as medical ethics has been one of the most visionary and socially valuable creations of the medical profession. Its beneficial influence has extended beyond physician/patient relations, to the shaping of many key humanistic and egalitarian features of the world’s legal and political institutions. The continued existence of medical ethics as a professionally influential normative system, however, is being challenged by international human rights. The UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, is likely to be an important point of intersection in this process.DOI
10.1136/jme.2004.006502
My notes
Similar books and articles
The activities of UNESCO in the area of ethics.H. ten Have - 2006 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (4):333-351.
Global bioethics at UNESCO: in defence of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.R. Andorno - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (3):150-154.
The Ambiguity of the Term 'Culture' and its Consequences for the Protection of Human Rights.Nermin Gedik - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:33-36.
UNESCO’s Activities in Ethics.Henk A. M. J. ten Have - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):7-15.
Global bioethics: did the universal declaration on bioethics and human rights miss the boat?C. C. Macpherson - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (10):588-590.
Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of "human dignity" in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.H. Schmidt - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (10):578-584.
Bioethics: An export product? Reflections on hands-on involvement in exploring the “external” validity of international bioethical declarations. [REVIEW]Mairi Levitt & Hub Zwart - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):367-377.
Human Dignity and Transhumanism: Do Anthro-Technological Devices Have Moral Status?Fabrice Jotterand - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):45-52.
Normative Foundations of Technology Transfer and Transnational Benefit Principles in the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.Thomas Alured Faunce & Hitoshi Nasu - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (3):296-321.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-05-22
Downloads
33 (#356,269)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
2009-05-22
Downloads
33 (#356,269)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Human Dignity and Human Rights as a Common Ground for a Global Bioethics.R. Andorno - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (3):223-240.
Respect for Persons in Bioethics: Towards a Human Rights-Based Account.Johan Brännmark - 2017 - Human Rights Review 18 (2):171-187.
Medical oath: use and relevance of the Declaration of Geneva. A survey of member organizations of the World Medical Association.Zoé Rheinsberg, Ramin Parsa-Parsi, Otmar Kloiber & Urban Wiesing - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (2):189-196.
Normative Foundations of Technology Transfer and Transnational Benefit Principles in the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.Thomas Alured Faunce & Hitoshi Nasu - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (3):296-321.
Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of "human dignity" in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.H. Schmidt - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (10):578-584.
References found in this work
Toward a Virtue-Based Normative Ethics for the Health Professions.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 1995 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (3):253-277.
Toward a reconstruction of medical morality: The primacy of the act of profession and the fact of illness.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 1979 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 4 (1):32-56.
Principlism and Its Alleged Competitors.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1995 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (3):181-198.