Is Diogenianus A source for Chrysippus' reply to the idle argument?

Dissertatio 36:343-364 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This text analyzes Diogenianus’ testimony (apud Eus., Praep. Ev. VI 8) as a source for Chrysippus’ reply to an objection leveled against Stoic Fate-determinism. I argue that the objection addressed by Chrysippus in the testimony bears relation to the Idle Argument as reported by both Cicero and Origen but, unlike the Idle Argument, deals with the notions of “that which depends on us” (τὸ παρ’ ἡμᾶς), “that which proceeds from us” (τὸ ἐξ ἡμῶν), and the issue of accountability.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.15210/dissertatio.v36i0.8671

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Bivalencia, fatalismo e inacción en Crisipo.Ricardo Salles - 2004 - Critica 36 (106):3-27.
Chrysippus’s response to Diodorus’s master argument.Harry A. Ide - 1992 - History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (2):133-148.
Chrysippus' dog as a case study in non-linguistic cognition.Michael Rescorla - 2009 - In Robert W. Lurz (ed.), The Philosophy of Animal Minds. Cambridge University Press. pp. 52--71.
Galen and Chrysippus Argument and Refutation in the de Placitis, Books Ii-Iii = Galenus En Chrysippus : Argumentatie En Weerlegging in de de Placitis, Boeken Ii En Iii.Teunis Lambertus Tieleman - 1992 - Department of Philosophy, University of Utrecht.
Chrysippus and the destruction of propositions: a defence of the standard interpretation.Michael B. Papazian - 2001 - History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (1):1-12.
Chrysippus' Modal Logic and Its Relation to Philo and Diodorus.Susanne Bobzien - 1993 - In K. Doering & Th Ebert (eds.), Dialektiker und Stoiker. Franz Steiner. pp. 63--84.
The Chrysippus intuition and contextual theories of truth.Jay Newhard - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (3):345-352.
Bodies, Predicates, and Fated Truths: Ontological Distinctions and the Terminology of Causation in Defenses of Stoic Determinism by Chrysippus and Seneca.Jula Wildberger - 2013 - In Francesca Guadelupe Masi & Stefano Maso (eds.), Fate, Chance, Fortune in Ancient Thought. Amsterdam: Hakkert. pp. 103-123.
Chrysippus' Puzzle About Identity.John Bowin - 2003 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24:239-251.
Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation in the de Placitis Books Ii - Iii.Teun Tieleman - 1996 - Brill.
Galen and Chrysippus on the soul: argument and refutation in the De placitis, books II-III.Teun Tieleman (ed.) - 1996 - New York: E.J. Brill.
Chrysippus Josiah B. Gould: The Philosophy of Chrysippus. (Philosophia Antiqua, xvii.) Pp. vi+222. Leiden: Brill, 1970. Paper, fl. 32. [REVIEW]A. A. Long - 1973 - The Classical Review 23 (02):214-216.
Chrysippus Confronts the Liar: The Case for Stoic Cassationism.Michael Papazian - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (3):197-214.
The Soul and Personal Identity in Early Stoicism: Two Theories?Aiste Celkyte - 2020 - Apeiron 53 (4):463-486.
On the 'standard' argument for fatalism.David Buller - 1995 - Philosophical Papers 24 (2):111-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-29

Downloads
14 (#990,520)

6 months
6 (#520,934)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paulo Fernando Tadeu Ferreira
Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Epicurus.D. N. Sedley - 1979 - The Classical Review 29 (01):82-.
Preconception, argument, and god.Malcolm Schofield - 1980 - In Malcolm Schofield, Myles Burnyeat & Jonathan Barnes (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 283--308.
El argos logos y su refutación por Crisipo.Ricardo Salles - 2005 - Tópicos: Revista de Filosofía 28 (1):239-254.

Add more references