Faith and Philosophy 14 (1):87-97 (1997)
Macnamara, La Palme Reyes, and Reyes have recently claimed to have shown decisively that the doctrine of the Trinity is internally consistent. They claim, furthermore, that their account does not commit them to any exotic emendations of standard logical theory. The paper demonstrates that they have established neither of these claims. In particular, it is argued that the set of statements they show to be consistent in fact expresses Sabellianism, not Trinitarianism; and that they can avoid this result only via commitment to the (questionable) doctrine of relative identity
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Social Trinitarianism and Tritheism Again: A Response to Brian Leftow.Tom McCall - 2003 - Philosophia Christi 5 (2):405 - 430.
On Behalf of Classical Trinitarianism: A Critique on Rahner on the Trinity.Phillip Cary - 1992 - The Thomist 56 (3):365 - 405.
The Problem with Social Trinitarianism: A Reply to Wierenga.Jeffrey E. Brower - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):295-303.
The Unfinished Business of Trinitarian Theorizing.Dale Tuggy - 2003 - Religious Studies 39 (2):165-183.
Ontology, Belief, and the Doctrine of the Trinity.Leroy T. Howe - 1981 - Sophia 20 (1):5 - 16.
Deception and the Trinity: A Rejoinder to Tuggy.William Hasker - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (1):117 - 120.
Anti Social Trinitarianism.Brian Leftow - 1999 - In Trinity, The. Oxford University Press. pp. 203-249.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads29 ( #169,734 of 2,146,213 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #227,266 of 2,146,213 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.