Equality does not entail equality across species

Environmental Ethics 24 (4):339-352 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I critique Peter Singer’s view that equality across species is a natural extension of equality. Singer presents one minor and two major arguments. The first major argument is that equality across species is implied by the traditional principle of equality. The second is that it follows from a conception that is behind the principle of equality, namely the moral “point of view of the universe.” The minor argument is a theory of the altruistic character and expanding circles of ethics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Equality Does Not Entail Equality across Species.Roger Fjellstrom - 2002 - Environmental Ethics 24 (4):339-352.
Species Equality and the Foundations of Moral Theory.James C. Anderson - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):347 - 365.
Equality of Opportunity Globalized?Darrel Moellendorf - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19 (2).
Rights, Interests, and Moral Equality.Meredith Williams - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (2):149-161.
Rights, interests, and moral equality.Meredith Williams - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (2):149-161.
Equality and Inequality in Confucianism.Chenyang Li - 2012 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (3):295-313.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
59 (#265,367)

6 months
8 (#506,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Is Singer's Ethics Speciesist?Roger Fjellstrom - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (1):91 - 106.
Love and Equal Value.Roger Fjellström - 2011 - Essays in Philosophy 12 (1):112-129.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references