Self-experimentation, ethics and efficacy

Monash Bioethics Review 24 (2):S43-S48 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Much fundamental progress in medicine and, more broadly, in medical sciences has required or benefited from self-experiments. This review provides a definition of self-experiments in which experimenters themselves are subjects for their research, and it considers the logical steps which such experiments require. Lay, medical and scientific communities are often unaware of the contributions and the full range of outcomes from self-experiments. Hence, some implications for ethics committees are explored.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical Issues in Experimentation on the Human Fetus.LeRoy Walters - 1974 - Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (1):33 - 54.
The ethics and politics of human experimentation.Paul Murray McNeill - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Arguments for Experimentation in Biology.Jane Maienschein - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:180 - 195.
Ethics and regulation of clinical research.Robert J. Levine - 1981 - Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
Vulnerable Subjects? The Case of Nonhuman Animals in Experimentation.Jane Johnson - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (4):497-504.
The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics.Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.) - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-29

Downloads
16 (#930,647)

6 months
1 (#1,508,411)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Personal knowledge and study participation.Rebecca Dresser - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (7):471-474.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references