Writing and judging: Adorno, Arendt and the chiasmus of natural history

Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (4):445-475 (2004)

Samir Gandesha
Simon Fraser University
This essay engages in a comparative analysis of Theodor W. Adorno and Hannah Arendt. It does so by situating both thinkers in terms of their respective Auseinandersetzungen with the fundamental ontology of Martin Heidegger. While Heidegger seeks to engage in a Destruktion of the opposition between time and being, Adorno and Arendt seek to understand this relation critically in terms of the concept of ‘natural history’. For both, a reading of Kant’s Third Critique becomes the indispensable means by which it is possible to locate a path pointing beyond the chiasmic structure of natural history. Key Words: Adorno • aesthetic experience • Arendt • Heidegger • history • inter-subjectivity • judgement • phenomenology • politics • writing.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0191453704044027
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,282
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Mastery or Dialectic? Arendt and Adorno on Nature.Buğra Yasin - 2019 - Critical Horizons 20 (4):333-349.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
75 ( #116,712 of 2,285,987 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #833,345 of 2,285,987 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature