Operating principles versus operating conditions in the distinction between associative and propositional processes

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):207-208 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Drawing on our Associative-Propositional Evaluation (APE) Model, we argue for the usefulness of distinguishing between basic operating principles of learning processes (associative linking vs. propositional reasoning) and secondary features pertaining to the conditions of their operation (automatic vs. controlled). We review empirical evidence that supports the joint operation of associative and propositional processes in the formation of new associations

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A causal framework for integrating learning and reasoning.David A. Lagnado - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):211-212.
The associative nature of human associative learning.David R. Shanks - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):225-226.
Associative learning without reason or belief.James D. Miles, Robert W. Proctor & E. J. Capaldi - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):217-218.
The truth and value of theories of associative learning.Tom Beckers & Bram Vervliet - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):200-201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-24

Downloads
32 (#488,566)

6 months
8 (#505,181)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Normativity of Automaticity.Michael Brownstein & Alex Madva - 2012 - Mind and Language 27 (4):410-434.
The Normativity of Automaticity.Alex Madva Michael Brownstein - 2012 - Mind and Language 27 (4):410-434.

Add more citations