How necessary is the unconscious as a predictive, explanatory, or prescriptive construct?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (1):28-28 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We elucidate the epistemological futility of using concepts such as unconscious thinking in research. Focusing on Newell & Shanks' (N&S's) use of the lens model as a framework, we clarify issues with regard to unconscious-thought theory (UTT) and self-insight studies. We examine these key points: Brunswikian psychology is absent in UTT; research on self-insight did not emerge to explore the unconscious; the accuracy of judgments does not necessitate the unconscious; and the prescriptive claim of UTT is unfounded.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Do implicit evaluations reflect unconscious attitudes?Adam Hahn & Bertram Gawronski - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (1):28-29.
Unconscious influences of_, not just _on, decision making.Géraldine Coppin - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (1):24-25.
What makes a conscious process conscious?Max Velmans - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (1):43-44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
35 (#470,921)

6 months
10 (#308,797)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations