Respect-due and respect-earned: negotiating student-teacher relationships

Ethics and Education 4 (1):3-17 (2009)
Abstract
Respect is a cardinal virtue in schools and foundational to our common ethical beliefs, yet its meaning is muddled. For philosophers Kant, Mill, and Rawls, whose influential theories span three centuries, respect includes appreciation of universal human dignity, equality, and autonomy. In their view children, possessors of human dignity, but without perspective and reasoning ability, are entitled only to the most minimal respect. While undeserving of mutual respect they are nonetheless expected to show unilateral respect. Dewey and Piaget, scions of the same liberal tradition, grant children a larger degree of autonomy and equality thereby approximating the full respect conditions reserved for adults in the prior theories. In this article, after reviewing the premises of respect, I attempt to blend the divide - between minimal and full respect - by separating respect-due from respect-earned . While the former, premised on human dignity, should be granted unconditionally to all, the latter is contingent upon qualities that one possesses or acquires over time. Adding the notion of respect-due is a constraint on the prevalent school practice of turning respect into demands for deference. The relevance of this distinction is discussed in terms of student-teacher relationships
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2010
DOI 10.1080/17449640902781356
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,820
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 1971 - Harvard University Press.
A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press. pp. 133-135.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
By.Craig Duncan - manuscript
Respect: Or, How Respect for Persons Became Respect for Autonomy.M. Therese Lysaught - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (6):665 – 680.
The Confucian Notion of Jing (Respect).Sin Yee Chan - 2006 - Philosophy East and West 56 (2):229 - 252.
Respect in Education.Johannes Giesinger - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (1):100-112.
The Place of Self-Respect in a Theory of Justice.Gerald Doppelt - 2009 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (2):127 – 154.
Justifying a Respect for Nature.Gene Spitler - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (3):255-260.
Respect and Membership in the Moral Community.Carla Bagnoli - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (2):113 - 128.
Three Types of Self-Respect.David Middleton - 2006 - Res Publica 12 (1):59-76.
Added to PP index
2010-07-27

Total downloads
34 ( #164,775 of 2,210,108 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #222,637 of 2,210,108 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature