AI and Society:1-15 (forthcoming)
AbstractCertain research strands can yield “forbidden knowledge”. This term refers to knowledge that is considered too sensitive, dangerous or taboo to be produced or shared. Discourses about such publication restrictions are already entrenched in scientific fields like IT security, synthetic biology or nuclear physics research. This paper makes the case for transferring this discourse to machine learning research. Some machine learning applications can very easily be misused and unfold harmful consequences, for instance, with regard to generative video or text synthesis, personality analysis, behavior manipulation, software vulnerability detection and the like. Up till now, the machine learning research community embraces the idea of open access. However, this is opposed to precautionary efforts to prevent the malicious use of machine learning applications. Information about or from such applications may, if improperly disclosed, cause harm to people, organizations or whole societies. Hence, the goal of this work is to outline deliberations on how to deal with questions concerning the dissemination of such information. It proposes a tentative ethical framework for the machine learning community on how to deal with forbidden knowledge and dual-use applications.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Moral Machines:Teaching Robots Right From Wrong: Teaching Robots Right From Wrong.Wendell Wallach & Colin Allen - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Artificial Intelligence Crime: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Foreseeable Threats and Solutions.Thomas C. King, Nikita Aggarwal, Mariarosaria Taddeo & Luciano Floridi - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (1):89-120.
The Ontological Interpretation of Informational Privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):185–200.
Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
Citations of this work
The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines.Thilo Hagendorff - 2020 - Minds and Machines 30 (1):99-120.
A Hippocratic Oath for Mathematicians? Mapping the Landscape of Ethics in Mathematics.Dennis Müller, Maurice Chiodo & James Franklin - 2022 - Science and Engineering Ethics 28 (5):1-30.
The Banality of (Automated) Evil: Critical Reflections on the Concept of Forbidden Knowledge in Machine Learning Research.Rosa Marina Senent Julián & Diego Bueso Acevedo - forthcoming - Recerca.Revista de Pensament I Anàlisi.
A Virtue-Based Framework to Support Putting AI Ethics into Practice.Thilo Hagendorff - 2022 - Philosophy and Technology 35 (3):1-24.
Similar books and articles
Machine Learning Ecml-93 : European Conference on Machine Learning, Vienna, Austria, April 5-7, 1993 : Proceedings.Pavel B. Brazdil & Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence - 1993 - Springer Verlag.
From Privacy to Anti-Discrimination in Times of Machine Learning.Thilo Hagendorff - 2019 - Ethics and Information Technology 21 (4):331-343.
Argument Based Machine Learning Applied to Law.Martin Možina, Jure Žabkar, Trevor Bench-Capon & Ivan Bratko - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (1):53-73.
Ethical and Legal Issues in Publication and Dissemination of Scholarly Knowledge: A Summary of the Published Evidence. [REVIEW]Krishna Regmi - 2011 - Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (1):71-81.
Nonmonotonic Reasoning , Argumentation and Machine Learning 1 Introduction.Peter Clark - 1990 - Argumentation:1-11.
Forbidden Knowledge and Science as Professional Activity.Deborah G. Johnson - 1996 - The Monist 79 (2):197-217.
Reframing the Question of Forbidden Knowledge for Modern Science.Deborah G. Johnson - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):445-461.
A Dynamic Interaction Between Machine Learning and the Philosophy of Science.Jon Williamson - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (4):539-549.
The Limits of Machine Intelligence.Henry Shevlin, Karina Vold, Matthew Crosby & Marta Halina - 2019 - EMBO Reports 49177 (20).
15 Challenges for AI: Or What AI (Currently) Can’T Do.Thilo Hagendorff & Katharina Wezel - 2020 - AI and Society 35 (2):355-365.
Mechanistic Models and the Explanatory Limits of Machine Learning.Emanuele Ratti & Ezequiel López-Rubio - unknown
Exposing the Causal Structure of Processes by Learning CP-Logic Programs.Hendrik Blockeel - 2008 - In Tu-Bao Ho & Zhi-Hua Zhou (eds.), Pricai 2008: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 2--2.