- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Research Use of Electronic Health Records: Patients’ Views on Alternative Approaches to Permission
Catherine M. Hammack-Aviran, Kathleen M. Brelsford, Kevin C. McKenna, Ross D. Graham, Zachary M. Lampron & Laura M. Beskow
AJOB Empirical Bioethics 11 (3):172-186 (2020)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Physician-Patient Relationship and a National Health Information Network.Leslie Pickering Francis - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (1):36-49.
Electronic health records: Use, barriers and satisfaction among physicians who care for black and Hispanic patients.Ashish K. Jha, David W. Bates, Chelsea Jenter, E. John Orav, Jie Zheng, Paul Cleary & Steven R. Simon - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (1):158-163.
Electronic health records: which practices have them, and how are clinicians using them?Steven R. Simon, Madeline L. McCarthy, Rainu Kaushal, Chelsea A. Jenter, Lynn A. Volk, Eric G. Poon, Kevin C. Yee, E. John Orav, Deborah H. Williams & David W. Bates - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (1):43-47.
How Bioethics Principles Can Aid Design of Electronic Health Records to Accommodate Patient Granular Control.Eric M. Meslin & Peter H. Schwartz - 2014 - Journal of General Internal Medicine 30 (1):3-6.
The accuracy of using integrated electronic health care data to identify patients with undiagnosed diabetes mellitus.Michael L. Ho, Nadine Lawrence, Carl van Walraven, Doug Manuel, Erin Keely, Janine Malcolm, Robert D. Reid & Alan J. Forster - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (3):606-611.
Dreams and Nightmares: Practical and Ethical Issues for Patients and Physicians Using Personal Health Records.Matthew Wynia & Kyle Dunn - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (1):64-73.
Patients' views concerning research on medical practices: Implications for consent.Kevin P. Weinfurt, Juli M. Bollinger, Kathleen M. Brelsford, Travis J. Crayton, Rachel J. Topazian, Nancy E. Kass, Laura M. Beskow & Jeremy Sugarman - 2016 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 7 (2):76-91.
Patients' direct access to their electronic medical record using the internet: A literature review.Marie C. Leroy & Michel Dupuis - 2014 - Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics 5 (5):9-22.
Improving Health Care Outcomes through Personalized Comparisons of Treatment Effectiveness Based on Electronic Health Records.Sharona Hoffman & Andy Podgurski - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):425-436.
Physicians, Patients and Confidentiality: The Role of Physicians in Electronic Health Records.Lee Black & Emily Anderson - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):50-51.
Confidentiality, Electronic Health Records, and the Clinician.Stuart Graves - 2013 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 56 (1):105-125.
Low risk research using routinely collected identifiable health information without informed consent: encounters with the Patient Information Advisory Group.C. Metcalfe, R. M. Martin, S. Noble, J. A. Lane, F. C. Hamdy & J. L. de NealDonovan - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (1):37-40.
Low risk research using routinely collected identifiable health information without informed consent: encounters with the Patient Information Advisory Group.C. Metcalfe, R. M. Martin, S. Noble, J. A. Lane, F. C. Hamdy, D. E. Neal & J. L. Donovan - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (1):37-40.
Ethical and legal risks associated with archival research.Daniel O. Taube & Susan Burkhardt - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (1):59 – 67.
Personal Care in Learning Health Care Systems.Franklin G. Miller & Scott Y. H. Kim - 2015 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 25 (4):419-435.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-04-28
Downloads
16 (#904,500)
6 months
6 (#514,728)
2020-04-28
Downloads
16 (#904,500)
6 months
6 (#514,728)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Mining the Data: Exploring Rural Patients’ Attitudes about the Use of Their Personal Information in Research.Jennifer B. McCormick, Margaret Hopkins, Erik B. Lehman & Michael J. Green - 2022 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 13 (2):89-106.
Medical Technologies Past and Present: How History Helps to Understand the Digital Era.Vanessa Rampton, Maria Böhmer & Anita Winkler - 2022 - Journal of Medical Humanities 43 (2):343-364.
References found in this work
Alternative consent models for comparative effectiveness studies: Views of patients from two institutions.Nancy Kass, Ruth Faden, Rachel E. Fabi, Stephanie Morain, Kristina Hallez, Danielle Whicher, Sean Tunis, Rachael Moloney, Donna Messner & James Pitcavage - 2016 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 7 (2):92-105.
Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study.M. R. Robling - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):104-109.
Public attitudes to the use in research of personal health information from general practitioners' records: a survey of the Irish general public.Brian S. Buckley, Andrew W. Murphy & Anne E. MacFarlane - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (1):50-55.
Patients' views concerning research on medical practices: Implications for consent.Kevin P. Weinfurt, Juli M. Bollinger, Kathleen M. Brelsford, Travis J. Crayton, Rachel J. Topazian, Nancy E. Kass, Laura M. Beskow & Jeremy Sugarman - 2016 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 7 (2):76-91.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-g9b9l uwo