Philosophical Studies 133 (1):55-81 (2007)

Elizabeth Harman
Princeton University
Part One addresses the question whether the fact that some persons love something, worship it, or deeply care about it, can endow moral status on that thing. I argue that the answer is “no.” While some cases lend great plausibility to the view that love or worship can endow moral status, there are other cases in which love or worship clearly fails to endow moral status. Furthermore, there is no principled way to distinguish these two types of cases, so we must conclude that love or worship never endow moral status. Part Two takes up the hard question of why we have to be careful of things that others love or worship, given that the things do not thereby have moral status. I argue that it is sometimes bad for those who love or worship the things if we mistreat them. I develop an account of when love and worship, and person projects more generally, succeed in expanding the scope of what counts as good or bad for the person engaged in the project.
Keywords Abortion  Desire  Environment  Fetus  Love  Moral status  Well-being  Worship
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-006-9006-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
A Defense of Abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
The Potentiality Problem.Elizabeth Harman - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):173 - 198.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moral Status, Final Value, and Extrinsic Properties.Nicolas Delon - 2014 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 114 (3pt3):371-379.
For the Sake of a Stone? Inanimate Things and the Demands of Morality.Simon P. James - 2011 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (4):384-397.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Lover’s Shame.Ward E. Jones - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):615-630.
The Moral Status of Preembryos, Embryos, Fetuses, and Infants.C. Strong - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (5):457-478.
Moral Status as a Matter of Degree?David DeGrazia - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):181-198.
The Moral Status of Human Fetuses.Lucille R. Cormier - 1988 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Metaphorical Imagination: The Legal and Moral Status of Embryos and Fetuses in Four Common Law Countries.Kayhan Pake Parsi - 1998 - Dissertation, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Galveston
Persons as Objects of Love.Ty Landrum - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (4):417-439.
Public Reason and Prenatal Moral Status.Jeremy Williams - 2015 - The Journal of Ethics 19 (1):23-52.


Added to PP index

Total views
123 ( #96,431 of 2,520,805 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #137,490 of 2,520,805 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes