Teaching Philosophy 41 (2):151-173 (2018)

Authors
Daniel F. Hartner
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Abstract
What is the proper content of a course in professional ethics, such as business ethics, engineering ethics, or medical ethics? Though courses in professional ethics have been present in colleges and universities for decades, the question remains largely unsettled, even among philosophers. This state of affairs helps to sustain and even exacerbate public misconceptions about ethics and professional ethical training in higher education. I argue that the proper content of such courses remains a potential source of confusion because the term ‘ethics’ is ambiguous between philosophical and nonphilosophical forms of normative inquiry into behavior, where the former involves broad, context-sensitive reflection on moral obligation, and the latter involves the narrower analysis and codification of behavioral norms with less sensitivity to context. Failure to distinguish between these two senses of ethics can result in conflicting conceptions of and expectations for training and courses in professional ethics. I sketch some of the specific problems generated by the ambiguity. I conclude by proposing an initial step toward a solution, one which focuses on making more explicit the distinction between courses that aim to teach professional policy and “best practices” and those that encourage genuine philosophical inquiry into morality and the good life.
Keywords Teaching Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0145-5788
DOI 10.5840/teachphil201851186
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Corporate Attorney Whistle-Blowing: Devising a Proper Standard.Thomas W. Dunfee & Virginia G. Maurer - 1992 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 11 (3/4):3-39.
Professional Ethics.R. Subramanian - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
Advertising and Program Content.Virginia Held - 1984 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 3 (3/4):61-76.
The Realist’s Challenge in Professional Ethics: Taking Some Cues From Legal Philosophy.Daniel E. Wueste - 1999 - Professional Ethics, a Multidisciplinary Journal 7 (2):3-22.
Engineering Ethics in China in Advance.Hengli Zhang & Michael Davis - forthcoming - Business and Professional Ethics Journal.
The Descriptive Content of Names as Predicate Modifiers.Olga Poller - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (9):2329-2360.
Professional Ethics Codes.A. Remisova - 2000 - Filozofia 55 (3):210-228.
A Classification Scheme for Codes of Business Ethics.Bruce R. Gaumnitz & John C. Lere - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 49 (4):329-335.
Professional Norms in Advance.Wade Robison - forthcoming - Teaching Ethics.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-05-19

Total views
26 ( #427,216 of 2,462,487 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,311 of 2,462,487 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes