Was the scientific revolution really a revolution in science?

In Jamil Ragep & Sally Ragep (eds.), Tradition, Transmission, Transformation. Brill. pp. 489–525 (1996)

Authors
Gary Hatfield
University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
This chapter poses questions about the existence and character of the Scientific Revolution by deriving its initial categories of analysis and its initial understanding of the intellectual scene from the writings of the seventeenth century, and by following the evolution of these initial categories in succeeding centuries. This project fits the theme of cross cultural transmission and appropriation -- a theme of the present volume -- if one takes the notion of a culture broadly, so that, say, seventeenth and eighteenth or nineteenth century European intellectual cultures are deemed sufficiently distinct that one can speak of the "transmission" of texts and ideas from the one to the other as cross cultural. I maintain that a process of transforming and assimilating seventeenth century achievements manifests itself in two distinct cultures of interpretation, one developed by historians of philosophy, the other by scientists and historians of science. The first, following actor's categories, interprets the revolution in the seventeenth century as a philosophical displacement, partly fomented by a radical change in astronomical theory; the second, retrospectively applying the post nineteenth century sense of the term "science" to seventeenth century events, finds a "scientific" revolution, or the birth of modern science. The chapter proposes interpreting the Scientific Revolution as a revolution in natural philosophy and metaphysics
Keywords Scientific revolution  History of science and history of philosophy  New science  Physics as a discipline  Historiography of the Scientific Revolution  History of early modern philosophy  Relation of science to metaphysics  Johannes Kepler  Galileo  Rene Descartes  Johann Jakob Brucker
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principia Philosophiae.René Descartes - 1644 - Amsterdam: Apud Danielem Elzevirium.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bogdanov and Lenin: Epistemology and Revolution.David G. Rowley - 1996 - Studies in East European Thought 48 (1):1 - 19.
National Styles in Science: A Possible Factor in the Scientific Revolution?John Henry - 2005 - In David N. Livingstone & Charles W. J. Withers (eds.), Geography and Revolution. University of Chicago Press.
Rethinking the Scientific Revolution.Margaret J. Osler (ed.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
“Do We Need a Scientific Revolution.Nicholas Maxwell - 2008 - Journal for Biological Physics and Chemistry 8 (3):95-105.
Reconstruction of the Optical Revolution: Lakatos Vs. Laudan.Xiang Chen - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:103 - 109.
Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
385 ( #14,220 of 2,272,229 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #23,589 of 2,272,229 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature