Punishment, Socially Deprived Offenders, and Democratic Community

Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):121-136 (2013)
The idea that victims of social injustice who commit crimes ought not to be subject to punishment has attracted serious attention in recent legal and political philosophy. R. A. Duff has argued, for example, a states that perpetrates social injustice lacks the standing to punish victims of such injustice who commit crimes. A crucial premiss in his argument concerns the fact that when courts in liberal society mete out legitimate criminal punishments, they are conceived as acting in the name of all citizens—on behalf of the whole political community. Resisting this premiss, Peter Chau has suggested that courts ought to be conceived as acting only in the name of “just citizens”: citizens who cannot be plausibly seen as having contributed to distributive injustice. When conceived in this way, Chau argues, courts can no longer plausibly be regarded as lacking standing to punish. This article uses the debate between Duff and Chau to explain why the question of whether to punish socially deprived offenders can only be answered adequately when connected to broader concerns of democratic theory. Specifically, it argues that Chau’s proposal is not available within the context of the kind of political community upon which (Duff rightly believes) a system of liberal criminal law depends for its justification and maintenance: a community in which citizens see the law as embodying shared norms whose specific demands they disagree about. State officials are morally permitted to see themselves as acting on behalf of a subset of the citizenry, I argue, only in circumstances of democratic crisis : circumstances in which a moral community can no longer be plausibly said to exist
Keywords Punishment  Standing  Social justice  Democracy  Liberalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11572-012-9179-4
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,871
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Rescuing Justice and Equality.G. A. Cohen (ed.) - 2008 - Harvard University Press.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Punishment.Zachary Hoskins - 2016 - Analysis:anw022.
A Moral Predicament in the Criminal Law.Gary Watson - 2015 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (2):168-188.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Duff on the Legitimacy of Punishment of Socially Deprived Offenders.Peter Chau - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):247-254.
Punishment, Communication and Community.Antony Duff - 2003 - In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
''Deterrent Punishment and Respect for Persons''.Zachary Hoskins - 2011 - Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 8 (2):369-384.
Punishment and Justice.Jules Holroyd - 2010 - Social Theory and Practice 36 (1):78-111.
Fair Play, Political Obligation, and Punishment.Zachary Hoskins - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):53-71.
The Idea of a Justification for Punishment.Kevin Magill - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (1):86-101.
Punishment, Reintegration, and Atypical Victims.Christopher Ciocchetti - 2004 - Criminal Justice Ethics 23 (2):25-38.
The Disenfranchisement of Felons.L. R. - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (6):553-580.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
42 ( #140,483 of 2,232,007 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #99,076 of 2,232,007 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature