Malicious Meddling or Transparent Tracking? Telecare as a Logical Extension of Modern Communications Technology

American Journal of Bioethics 12 (9):45-47 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 9, Page 45-47, September 2012

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Telecare, Surveillance, and the Welfare State.Tom Sorell & Heather Draper - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (9):36-44.
Using Foucault to Recast the Telecare Debate.Adrian Guta, Marilou Gagnon & Jean Daniel Jacob - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (9):57-59.
Malicious pleasure evaluated: Is pleasure an unconditional good?Irwin Goldstein - 2003 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (1):24–31.
Nudge Ethics: Just a Game of Billiards?Caroline J. Huang & Matthew L. Baum - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (2):22-24.
Why Not a Transparent Slow Code?Rosalind Ekman Ladd & Edwin N. Forman - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (11):29-30.
Logics of public communications.Jan Plaza - 2007 - Synthese 158 (2):165 - 179.
Descartes’s First Meditation.Avery Fouts - 2004 - International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):223-238.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-11

Downloads
14 (#994,498)

6 months
4 (#797,974)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Telecare, Surveillance, and the Welfare State.Tom Sorell & Heather Draper - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (9):36-44.

Add more references