Medicine Studies 3 (1):41-52 (2011)
Taking the visual appeal of the ‘bell curve’ as an example, this paper discusses in how far the availability of quantitative approaches (here: statistics) that comes along with representational standards immediately affects qualitative concepts of scientific reasoning (here: normality). Within the realm of this paper I shall focus on the relationship between normality, as defined by scientific enterprise, and normativity, that result out of the very processes of standardisation itself. Two hypotheses are guiding this analysis: (1) normality, as it is defined by the natural and the life sciences, must be regarded as an ontological, but epistemological important fiction and (2) standardised, canonical visualisations (such as the ‘bell curve’) impact on scientific thinking and reasoning to a significant degree. I restrict my analysis to the epistemological function of scientific representations of data: This means identifying key strategies of producing graphs and images in scientific practice. As a starting point, it is crucial to evaluate to what degree graphs and images could be seen as guiding scientific reasoning itself, for instance in attributing to them a certain epistemological function within a given field of research
|Keywords||Normality Normalisation Bell curve Representation Visualisation Canonical icon Epistemology Image science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Collapse of Distance: Epistemic Strategies of Science and Technoscience.Alfred Nordmann - 2006 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 41.
Representations of the Natural System in the Nineteenth Century.Robert J. O'Hara - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (2): 255–274.
Pictorial Representation in Biology.Peter J. Taylor & Ann S. Blum - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (2):125-134.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Making the Visual Visible in Philosophy of Science.Annamaria Carusi - 2012 - Spontaneous Generations 6 (1):106-114.
Scientific Visualisations and Aesthetic Grounds for Trust.Annamaria Carusi - 2008 - Ethics and Information Technology 10 (4):243-254.
Questioning the Standard of Normality: Steps to a More Effective Understanding of Mental Health.Dr Steven James Bartlett - manuscript
Coconstructed Functionality Instead of Functional Normality.Shu-Chen Li & Ulman Lindenberger - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):761-762.
Gyneacologists and Geneticists as Storytellers : Disease, Choice, and Normality as the Fabric of Narratives on Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis.Kristin Zeiler - 2007 - In Sonja Olin-Lauritzen & Lars-Christer Hydén (eds.), Medical Technologies and the Life World: The Social Construction of Normality. Routledge.
The Concept of Harm and the Significance of Normality.Guy Kahane & Julian Savulescu - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (3):318.
The Bell Curve Case for Heredity.Max Hocutt & Michael Levin - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (3):389-415.
Normische Gesetzeshypothesen Und Die Wissenschaftsphilosophische Bedeutung Des Nichtmonotonen Schliessens.Gerhard Schurz - 2001 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 32 (1):65-107.
Belief Ascription: Objective Sentences and Soft Facts.Andreas Kemmerling - 2003 - Facta Philosophica 5 (2):203-222.
Medical Technologies, the Lifeworld, and Normality : An Introduction.Sonja Olin Lauritzen & Lars-Christer Hydén - 2007 - In Sonja Olin-Lauritzen & Lars-Christer Hydén (eds.), Medical Technologies and the Life World: The Social Construction of Normality. Routledge.
What is 'Normal'? An Evolution-Theoretic Foundation for Normic Laws and Their Relation to Statistical Normality.Gerhard Schurz - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (4):476-497.
Added to index2011-09-12
Total downloads34 ( #144,923 of 2,146,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #385,701 of 2,146,810 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.