Mcluhan, system-study and technological determinism: Comments on professor Porter's paper

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1 (2):245-251 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/004839317100100206

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Three Species of Technological Dependency.Jim Gerrie - 2008 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 12 (3):184-194.
Should technological imperatives be obeyed?Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):181-189.
Beyond the Black box.Mikkel Flyverbom - 2005 - Social Epistemology 19 (2 & 3):225 – 229.
Distributing responsibility in the debate on sustainable biofuels.Laurens Landeweerd, Patricia Osseweijer & Julian Kinderlerer - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):531-543.
Comments on professor Hartshorne's paper: Comments.Richard Rorty - 1963 - Journal of Philosophy 60 (21):606-608.
Reflections on Modernity and Postmodernity in McLuhan and Baudrillard.Douglas Kellner - unknown
Comments on professor Putnam's comments.H. Margenau & E. P. Wigner - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (3):292-293.
I. mathematical modeling of election predictions: Final reply to professor Aubert.Herbert A. Simon - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):231 – 232.
McLuhan and Baudrillard: the masters of implosion.Gary Genosko - 1999 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
10 (#1,191,137)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references