Intrinsically Evil Actions According to St. Thomas Aquinas

Dissertation, University of Notre Dame (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

St. Thomas Aquinas clearly believed that some actions must be avoided in all circumstances, but according to certain authors the descriptions of these acts presuppose a moral judgment, e.g., the term 'murder' means 'wrongful killing.' Other authors argue that some actions described apart from a moral judgment are always evil, e.g., 'killing an innocent person' is absolutely prohibited. This dissertation attempts to clarify Aquinas's position by answering two questions: how are actions described, and how are they morally evaluated? ;According to Aquinas human actions are characterized by their principle, which is the agent's intention. If Joe shoots a gun to kill a person, his act is best described as killing a man, not as making a noise; but if he shoots a gun to frighten a robin, his act is properly described as making a noise. ;Similarly, the moral character of an action depends upon its principle and not its effects. According to Aquinas the human good is found in an order to God, even as a teacher is good through an order to his students' knowledge. But an action has its order, and is good or evil, through its principle and not its effects. Thus, a teacher's action might be ordered to learning, and be a good act of teaching, even though ill-prepared students fail to learn. Similarly, human actions are good insofar as they arise from the divine principle; they are evil insofar as they exclude this principle. ;Human actions share in the divine agency through natural inclinations, for God impresses in all creatures a desire for the good. Therefore, an action opposes the order to the divine good insofar as it opposes a natural inclination; as such, it is intrinsically evil. Thus, bestiality, which is opposed to the natural sexual inclination, is always evil. Similarly, any action directed toward the evil of an innocent person, such as killing, is always evil, for everyone naturally seeks the good in union with others; this union, however, is opposed through acts of harm. ;According to Aquinas, then, some actions, described without morally valuative terms, are intrinsically evil

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thomas Aquinas on the Good and Evil of Human Acts.Hsiao-Huei Pan - 2008 - Philosophy and Culture 35 (4):79-96.
Dispositional accounts of evil personhood.Luke Russell - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (2):231 - 250.
The concept of evil.Marcus G. Singer - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (2):185-214.
Purity and Judgment in Morality.John Kekes - 1988 - Philosophy 63 (246):453 - 469.
Thomas Aquinas on God and Evil.Brian Davies - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
The Reflexivity of Evil.John Kekes - 1998 - Social Philosophy and Policy 15 (1):216.
Foreword.Ralph McInerny - 2010 - In Steven J. Jensen (ed.), Good and Evil Actions: A Journey Through Saint Thomas Aquinas. Catholic University of America Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
3 (#1,712,040)

6 months
1 (#1,471,540)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references