Expectations for methodology and translation of animal research: a survey of health care workers

BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):29 (2015)

Abstract

Health care workers often perform, promote, and advocate use of public funds for animal research ; therefore, an awareness of the empirical costs and benefits of animal research is an important issue for HCW. We aim to determine what health-care-workers consider should be acceptable standards of AR methodology and translation rate to humans

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,660

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-07

Downloads
48 (#239,963)

6 months
1 (#388,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

Standards for Animal Research: Looking at the Middle.Rebecca Dresser - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):123-143.
Animal Rights V Animal Research: A Modest Proposal.J. Bernstein - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (5):300-303.
Animal Care Ethics, ANZCCART, and Public Perceptions of Animal Use Ethics.Fred Gifford - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):249-257.

Author's Profile

Nathan Nobis
Morehouse College

References found in this work

Are Animal Models Predictive for Humans?Niall Shanks, Ray Greek & Jean Greek - 2009 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 4:2.
Causality in Complex Systems.Andreas Wagner - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (1):83-101.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations