The idea of defense in historical and contemporary thinking about just war

Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):543-556 (2008)
Abstract
What is, or should be, the role of defense in thinking about the justification of use of armed force? Contemporary just war thinking prioritizes defense as the principal, and perhaps the only, just cause for resorting to armed force. By contrast, classic just war tradition, while recognizing defense as justification for use of force by private persons, did not reason from self-defense to the justification of the use of force on behalf of the political community, but instead rendered the idea of just cause for resort to force in terms of the sovereign's responsibility to maintain justice, vindicating those who had suffered from injustice and punishing evildoers. This paper moves through three major stages in the historical development of just war thinking, first examining a critical phase in the formation of the classical idea of just cause as the responsibility to maintain justice, then discussing the shift, characteristic of the modern period, to an idea of sovereignty as connected to the state and the prioritization of defense of the state as just cause for use of force, and lastly showing how this conception of the priority of defense became part of the recovery of just war thinking in the latter part of the twentieth century. The paper concludes by noting recent changes in thought on international law that tend to emphasize justice at the expense of the right of self-defense, suggesting that the roots of just war thinking imply the need for a similar rethinking of contemporary just war discourse
Keywords sovereignty  defense  Westphalian system  justice  just war  state
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2008.00361.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,810
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Thinking Comparatively About Religion and War. [REVIEW]James Turner Johnson - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (1):157-179.
Just and Unjust Wars.M. Walzer - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (209):415-420.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Getting It Right.James Turner Johnson - 2015 - Journal of Religious Ethics 43 (1):170-177.
James Turner Johnson and the 'Classic' Just War Tradition.Nahed Artoul Zehr - 2009 - Journal of Military Ethics 8 (3):190-201.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Defining War for the 21st Century.Steven Metz & Phillip R. Cuccia (eds.) - 2011 - Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
Waging Defensive War: The Idea and its Normative Importance.Joseph Boyle - 2011 - Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):148-159.
Proportionality and Self-Defense.Suzanne Uniacke - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (3):253-272.
Paul Ramsey and the Recovery of the Just War Idea.James Turner Johnson - 2002 - Journal of Military Ethics 1 (2):136-144.
War and Self-Defense.David Rodin - 2004 - Ethics and International Affairs 18 (1):63–68.
Self-Defense, Punishing Unjust Combatants and Justice in War.Steve Viner - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):297-319.
The Just War Idea: The State of the Question.James Turner Johnson - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):167-195.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
30 ( #177,212 of 2,202,778 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #150,076 of 2,202,778 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature