Nancy Kendrick
Wheaton College, Massachusetts
This paper considers Anselm’s Proslogion argument against a background of historical events that include philosophical disputes between Christian and Jewish polemicists. I argue that the Proslogion argument was addressed, in part, to non-Christian theists and that it offered a response to Jewish polemicists who had argued that the Christian conception of God as an instantiated unity was irrational. Anselm is not trying to convince atheists that there really is a God. He is arguing that the Christian conception of God is logically coherent
Keywords Existential  Necessity  Instantiation  Polemics  Incarnation  Unbecoming  Fittingness
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11153-010-9265-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,719
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Anselm.Sandra Visser & Thomas Williams - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Ontological Arguments and Belief in God.Graham Oppy - 1995 - Cambridge University Press.
Faith and Understanding.Paul Helm - 1997 - Wm. B. Eerdmans.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
46 ( #208,998 of 2,349,701 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,898 of 2,349,701 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes