Theism and the Criminalization of Sin

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (1):163-187 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The free will theodicy places significant value on free will: free will is of such substantial value, that God’s gift of free will to humans was justified, even though this gift foreseeably results in the most monstrous of evils. I will argue that when a state criminalizes sin, it can restrict or eliminate citizens’ exercise of metaphysical free will with respect to choosing to partake in or refrain from these activities. Given the value placed on free will in the free will theodicy, theists who endorse this theodicy should thus oppose the criminalization of what I will call Millian sins —that is, actions which are immoral, but which do not directly harm another person. In other words, such theists should oppose legal moralism.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-12

Downloads
441 (#46,656)

6 months
128 (#37,127)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeremy Koons
Georgetown University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

God, Freedom, and Evil.Alvin Plantinga - 1978 - Religious Studies 14 (3):407-409.
When is the Will Free?Peter van Inwagen - 1989 - Philosophical Perspectives 3:399 - 422.
Of the original contract".David Hume - 2007 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late modern philosophy: essential readings with commentary. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Freedom and money.G. A. Cohen - 1995 - Filosoficky Casopis 48 (1):89-114.
Philosophy of Religion.John H. Hick - 1963 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 37 (3):552-552.

View all 11 references / Add more references