Why We Still Need a Substantive Determination of Death

American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):55-57 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In their target article, Nielsen Busch and Mjaaland (2023) exhort us to stop “focus[ing] on the validity of the criteria for determination of [circulatory] death” and “instead [look at] DCD protoco...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Advance of Technoscience and the Problem of Death Determination.Bas de Boer & Jonne Hoek - 2020 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 24 (3):306-331.
Self-Determination of Death in Japan: A Review & Discussion.Atsushi Asai & Sayaka Sakamoto - 2007 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 17 (2):35-40.
The Definition of Death.Stuart Youngner - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford handbook of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Criteria for death: Self-determination and public policy.Hans-Martin Sass - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (4):445-454.
Epistemology of brain death determination.Douglas N. Walton - 1981 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (3):259-274.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-23

Downloads
11 (#1,137,779)

6 months
5 (#639,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karola Kreitmair
University of Wisconsin, Madison

References found in this work

Are DCD Donors Dead?Don Marquis - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (3):24-31.
Why DCD Donors Are Dead.John P. Lizza - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (1):42-60.
A Defense of the Dead Donor Rule.David Magnus - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (S4):36-38.

Add more references