Feyerabend, brownian motion, and the hiddenness of refuting facts

Philosophy of Science 44 (2):225-247 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I will develop a nontrivial interpretation of Feyerabend's concept of a hidden anomalous fact. Feyerabend's claim is that some anomalous facts will remain hidden in the absence of alternatives to the theories to be tested. The case of Brownian motion is given by Feyerabend to support this claim. The essential scientific difficulty in this case was the justification of correct and relevant descriptions of Brownian motion. These descriptions could not be simply determined from the available observational data. An examination, however, of this case shows that no alternative theory is or historically was thought to be necessary in order to justify descriptions of Brownian motion that "directly" refute thermodynamics. While Feyerabend's appraisal of this case therefore is incorrect, a sense is developed in which successful alternatives lend inductive support to the correctness of refuting experimental descriptions. Crucial though to the explanation of this support is the notion of arguments that show the possibilities for improving experimental fit

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Feyerabend and Laymon on brownian motion.Spyridon George Couvalis - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (3):415-421.
Einstein, Entropy, and Anomalies.Daniel Sirtes & Eric Oberheim - 2006 - AIP Conference Proceedings 861:1147-1154.
The case of Brownian motion: a note on Bachelier's contribution.Robert W. Dimand - 1993 - British Journal for the History of Science 26 (2):233-234.
Arithmetical Representations of Brownian Motion I.Willem Fouche - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (1):421-442.
Arithmetical representations of brownian motion I.Willem Fouché - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (1):421-442.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
69 (#82,832)

6 months
16 (#899,032)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ronald Laymon
Ohio State University

References found in this work

The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
Mr. Leibniz' third paper.Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz - 1956 - In H. G. Alexander (ed.), The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. Manchester University Press.
The Michelson-Morley Experiment: Descriptive dependence on to-be-tested Theories.Ronald Laymon - 1976 - In Peter K. Machamer & Robert G. Turnbull (eds.), Motion and Time, Space and Matter. Ohio State University Press. pp. 436--64.

Add more references