Review of Wittgenstein’s Critique of Russell’s Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement [Book Review]

Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 11 (2) (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

~

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.15173/jhap.v11i2.5486

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Interpreting Russell's Paralysis [review of James R. Connelly, Wittgenstein's Critique of Russell's Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement ].Graham P. Stevens - 2022 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 41.
Russell's Last (And Best) Multiple-Relation Theory of Judgement.Christopher Pincock - 2008 - Mind 117 (465):107 - 139.
Bertrand Russell and the Nature of Propositions: A History and Defence of the Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement.Samuel Lebens - 2017 - New York: Routledge.
How Wittgenstein Defeated Russell’s Multiple Relation Theory of Judgment.Peter W. Hanks - 2007 - Synthese 154 (1):121 - 146.
A Historically Informed Defence of the Multiple-Relation Theory of Judgment [review of Samuel Lebens, Bertrand Russell and the Nature of Propositions: a History and Defense of the Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement ].Landon D. C. Elkind - 2018 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 38:89-96.
Russell on Negative Judgement.Anssi Korhonen - 2020 - Topoi 39 (3):727-742.
Language and Logic in Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.Daniele Mezzadri - 2010 - Dissertation, University of Stirling
Judgements, facts and propositions: theories of truth in Russell, Wittgenstein and Ramsey.Colin Johnston & Peter Sullivan - 2018 - In Michael Glanzberg (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Truth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 150-192.
Wittgenstein et les théories du jugement de Russell et de Meinong.Jimmy Plourde - 2005 - Dialogue 44 (2):249-284.
Russell and Wittgenstein on Logical Form and Judgement: What did Wittgenstein Try that Wouldn't Work?James Connelly - 2013 - Theoria 80 (3):232-254.
Russell, Wittgenstein, and synthesis in thought.Colin Johnston - 2012 - In José L. Zalabardo (ed.), Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 15.
Re-examining Russell's Paralysis: Ramified Type-Theory and Wittgenstein's Objection to Russell's Theory of Judgment.Graham Stevens - 2003 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 23 (1).
The effect of Wittgenstein's criticisms on Russell's theory of knowledge.Raymond E. Boggs - unknown
Russell's multiple relation theory of judgment.Nicholas Griffin - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 47 (2):213 - 247.
The Joint Philosophical Program of Russell and Wittgenstein and Its Demise.Nikolay Milkov - 2013 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 2 (1):81-105.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-03

Downloads
20 (#763,787)

6 months
5 (#626,659)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references