Philosophical Studies (forthcoming)

Authors
Karen S. Lewis
Barnard College
Abstract
One of the central questions of discourse dynamics is when an anaphoric pronoun is licensed. This paper addresses this question as it pertains to the complex data involving anaphora and negation. It is commonly held that negation blocks anaphoric potential, for example, we cannot say “Bill doesn’t have a car. It is black”. However, there are many exceptions to this generalization. This paper examines a variety of types of discourses in which anaphora on indefinites under the scope of negation is felicitous. These cases are not just of intrinsic interest, but I argue present serious problems for the dynamic semantic framework, which builds the licensing facts into the semantics. I argue in favor of adopting a dynamic pragmatics, a theory that explains context change through general Gricean principles, and combining it with a static, d-type theory of anaphora, in which pronouns go proxy for definite descriptions.
Keywords Anaphora  Dynamic Pragmatics  Pronouns  Dynamic Semantics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-020-01489-w
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,109
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
On Quantifier Domain Restriction.Jason Stanley & Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (2-3):219--61.
Defaults in Update Semantics.Frank Veltman - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (3):221 - 261.
Dynamic Predicate Logic.Jeroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof - 1991 - Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (1):39-100.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Deixis and Anaphora.François Recanati - 2002 - In Zoltan Gendler Szabo (ed.), Semantics Versus Pragmatics. Clarendon Press. pp. 286--316.
Towards a Generalization of Anaphora.van Deemter Kees - 1992 - Journal of Semantics 9 (1):27-51.
Hegel's Glutty Negation.Elena Ficara - 2015 - History and Philosophy of Logic 36 (1):29-38.
Logical Negation.Ignacio Angelelli - 1983 - Review of Metaphysics 36 (4):925-926.
Negation in the Language of Theology – Some Issues.Adam Olszewski - 2018 - Philosophical Problems in Science 65:87-107.
Negation of the Negation in Logical and Historical Analysis.M. F. Vorob'ev - 1969 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 8 (2):190-205.
A Situation-Theoretic Representations of Text Meaning: Anaphora, Quantification, and Negation'.Dag Westerståhl, Björn Haglund & Torbjörn Lager - 1993 - In Peter Aczel, David Israel, Yosuhiro Katagiri & Stanley Peters (eds.), Situation Theory and its Applications Vol. CSLI Publications. pp. 375--408.
Empirical Negation.Michael De - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (1):49-69.
On Bound Anaphora in Type Logical Grammar.Glyn Morrill - 2003 - In R. Oehrle & J. Kruijff (eds.), Resource Sensitivity, Binding, and Anaphora. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 159--177.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-07-24

Total views
25 ( #416,554 of 2,411,478 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #149,499 of 2,411,478 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes