The politics of ignorance

The Philosophers' Magazine 41:87-93 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For much of the past half century, politicians and scientists have largely spoken with a single voice on the issue of race. The experience of Nazism and the Holocaust made racial science politically unacceptable. It also shaped the scientific consensus that race was a social myth, not a biological reality. Today, however, that scientific consensus is beginning to crack.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The politics of ignorance.Kenan Malik - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 41 (41):87-93.
Plato’s Politics of Ignorance.Verity Harte - 2013 - In Verity Harte & Melissa Lane (eds.), Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 139-154.
Economism, freedom, and “the epistemology and politics of ignorance”: Reply to Friedman.Mark Amadeus Notturno - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (4):431-452.
Popper, Weber, and Hayek: The epistemology and politics of ignorance.Jeffrey Friedman - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):1-58.
The biological reification of race.Lisa Gannett - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):323-345.
The Good Old Liberal Consensus.Daniel A. Kaufman - 2019 - The Philosophers' Magazine 87:96-99.
Consensus in Science.Miriam Solomon - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 10:193-204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
5 (#847,061)

6 months
5 (#1,552,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references