Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):160-161 (1999)
O'Brien & Opie's (O&O's) theory demands a view of unconscious processing that is incompatible with virtually all current PDP models of neural activity. Relative to the alternatives, the theory is closer to an AI than a parallel distributed processing (PDP) perspective, and its treatment of phenomenology is ad hoc. It raises at least one important question: Could features of network relaxation be the “switch” that turns an unconscious into a conscious network?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Connectionism, Cognitive Maps and the Development of Objectivity.Ronald L. Chrisley - 1992 - School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex.
Connectionism.[author unknown] - 1991 - Wiley.
Quantities of Qualia.Michael S. C. Thomas & Anthony P. Atkinson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):169-170.
Connectionism and Rules and Representation Systems: Are They Compatible?William P. Bechtel - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):5-16.
What About Consciousness During Learning?Annie Vinter & Pierre Perruchet - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):173-173.
Constructing Consciousness.Gezinus Wolters & R. Hans Phaf - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):174-174.
Autonomous Processing in Parallel Distributed Processing Networks.Michael R. W. Dawson & D. P. Schopflocher - 1992 - Philosophical Psychology 5 (2):199-219.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #362,667 of 2,143,794 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #120,650 of 2,143,794 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.