Authors
Berislav Marušić
University of Edinburgh
Abstract
Suppose we suffer a loss, such as the death of a loved one. In light of her death, we will typically feel grief, as it seems we should. After all, our loved one’s death is a reason for grief. Yet with the passage of time, our grief will typically diminish, and this seems somehow all right. However, our reason for grief ostensibly remains the same, since the passage of time does not undo our loss. How, then, could it not be wrong for grief to diminish? Or how are we to make sense of the diminution of grief? Do reasons expire? —The paper clarifies the puzzle and then considers four responses. It argues that all of them are inadequate and that there are principled reasons why this should be so: In experiencing grief we are apprehending a loss. Yet in our effort to understand the diminution of grief, we must apprehend ourselves. But because grief is not about ourselves, our apprehension of the diminution of grief is at odds with our apprehension of the object of grief. This gives rise to a kind of double-vision, which is why the puzzle eludes a solution.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Slaves of the Passions.Mark Schroeder - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.

View all 41 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The fitting resolution of anger.Oded Na’Aman - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (8):2417-2430.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Falsely, Sanely, Shallowly: Reflections on the Special Character of Grief.Janet McCracken - 2005 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1):139-156.
Sorrow and the Sage: Grief in the Zhuangzi.Amy Olberding - 2007 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (4):339-359.
Grief's Rationality, Backward and Forward.Michael Cholbi - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (2):255-272.
Grief: Putting the Past Before Us.Michael R. Kelly - 2016 - Quaestiones Disputatae 7 (1):156-177.
Codes Should Address Exploitation of Grief by Photographers.George E. Padgett - 1985 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 1 (1):50 – 56.
False Emotions.Tony Milligan - 2008 - Philosophy 83 (2):213-230.
Finding the Good in Grief: What Augustine Knew but Meursault Couldn't.Michael Cholbi - 2017 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3 (1):91-105.
On Grief’s Ambiguous Nature.Sonja Rinofner-Kreidl - 2016 - Quaestiones Disputatae 7 (1):178-207.
Possibilities of Grieving.Mikel Burley - 2015 - Philosophy and Literature 39 (1):154-171.
Ongoing: On Grief’s Open-Ended Rehearsal.Line Ingerslev - 2018 - Continental Philosophy Review 51 (3):343-360.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-06-23

Total views
361 ( #23,349 of 2,439,026 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
84 ( #7,609 of 2,439,026 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes