Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (4):951-967 (2017)

Dominic Martin
Université du Québec à Montréal
Who should decide how a machine will decide what to do when it is driving a car, performing a medical procedure, or, more generally, when it is facing any kind of morally laden decision? More and more, machines are making complex decisions with a considerable level of autonomy. We should be much more preoccupied by this problem than we currently are. After a series of preliminary remarks, this paper will go over four possible answers to the question raised above. First, we may claim that it is the maker of a machine that gets to decide how it will behave in morally laden scenarios. Second, we may claim that the users of a machine should decide. Third, that decision may have to be made collectively or, fourth, by other machines built for this special purpose. The paper argues that each of these approaches suffers from its own shortcomings, and it concludes by showing, among other things, which approaches should be emphasized for different types of machines, situations, and/or morally laden decisions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-016-9833-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Thinking, Fast and Slow.Daniel Kahneman - 2011 - New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
Minds, Brains, and Programs.John R. Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies.Nick Bostrom (ed.) - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Minds, Brains and Science.John R. Searle - 1984 - Harvard University Press.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence.Seth D. Baum - 2020 - AI and Society 35 (1):165-176.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Men and Abortion Decisions.John Hardwig - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (2):41-45.
Group Decisions in Humans and Animals: A Survey.Christian List - 2009 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364:719-742.
Making Christian Life and Death Decisions.Kevin L. Flannery - 2011 - Christian Bioethics 17 (2):140-152.
Können wir uns dazu entscheiden, etwas zu glauben?Simon Walgenbach - 2016 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 93 (4):583-592.
Making Christian Life and Death Decisions.SJ Flannery - 2011 - Christian Bioethics 17 (2):140-152.
Undecidability Over Continuous Time.Jerzy Mycka & José Félix Costa - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (5):649-658.
Clarifying Capacity: Reasons and Value.Jules Holroyd - forthcoming - In Lubomira Radoilska (ed.), Autonomy and Mental Health. Oxford University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
41 ( #267,121 of 2,462,976 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,108 of 2,462,976 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes