Authors
Jonathan Cohen
University of California, San Diego
Mohan Matthen
University of Toronto, Mississauga
Abstract
Molyneux's Question (MQ) concerns whether a newly sighted man would recognize/distinguish a sphere and a cube by vision, assuming he could previously do this by touch. We argue that (MQ) splits into questions about (a) shared representations of space in different perceptual systems, and about (b) shared ways of constructing higher dimensional spatiotemporal features from information about lower dimensional ones, most of the technical difficulty centring on (b). So understood, MQ resists any monolithic answer: everything depends on the constraints faced by particular perceptual systems in extracting features of higher dimensionality from those of lower. Each individual question of this type is empirical and must be investigated separately. We present several variations on MQ based on different levels of dimensional integration—some of these are familiar, some novel adaptations of problems known elsewhere, and some completely novel. Organizing these cases in this way is useful because it unifies a set of disparate questions about intermodal transfer that have held philosophical and psychological interest, suggests a new range of questions of the same type, sheds light on similarities and differences between members of the family, and allows us to formulate a much-augmented set of principles and questions concerning the intermodal transfer of spatiotemporal organization.
Keywords Molyneux's Question  crossmodal identification  associationism  Locke  Gareth Evans  space perception  time perception
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019, 2020
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00048402.2019.1603246
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Consciousness Explained.Daniel C. Dennett - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4):905-910.
What Makes Time Special?Craig Callender - 2017 - Oxford University Press.
Problems From Locke.J. L. Mackie - 1976 - Clarendon Press.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Representing Shape in Sight and Touch.E. J. Green - forthcoming - Mind and Language.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Molyneux's Questions.Peter Baumann - 2004 - In Ralph Schumacher (ed.), Perception and Reality. mentis. pp. 168-187.
Molyneux’s Question.Robert Hopkins - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (3):441-464.
Leibniz on Molyneux's Question.Brian Glenney - 2012 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (3):247-264.
Do Things Look the Way They Feel?John Schwenkler - 2013 - Analysis 73 (1):86-96.
Locke's Answer to Molyneux's Thought Experiment.Mike Bruno & Eric Mandelbaum - 2010 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 27 (2):165-80.
Molyneux’s Question in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.Juan R. Loaiza - 2017 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 32 (2):231-247.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-08-04

Total views
709 ( #8,122 of 2,432,261 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
80 ( #8,639 of 2,432,261 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes