Hypatia 29 (2):269-286 (2014)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Because of risks of essentialism and homogenization, feminist theorists frequently avoid making precise ontological claims, especially in regard to specifying bodily connections and differences among women. However well-intentioned, this trend may actually run counter to the spirit of intersectionality by shifting feminists' attention away from embodiment, fostering oppressor-centric theories, and obscuring privilege within feminism. What feminism needs is not to turn from ontological specificity altogether, but to engage a new kind of ontological project that can account for the material complexity of social space in the twenty-first century. Taking inspiration from the phenomenological concept of flesh as well as ecofeminism and María Lugones's theory of the colonial/modern gender system, this essay argues that our own flesh is related to that of others through lines of intercorporeal relations that collectively form topographies of flesh. When we attend to those material relationships present in a particular locality at a point in time, we are able to recognize topographical aggregates of beings that can serve as a basis for this new feminist ontology. An example from Toni Morrison's Beloved involving a human woman and a nonhuman one is used as a paradigm for thinking ontological connection and difference at the same time
|
Keywords | ontology feminism phenomenology ecofeminism body |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/hypa.12087 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Toward a Phenomenology of Sexual Difference: Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, Beauvoir.Sara Heinämaa - 2003 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
View all 19 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
“We Do This Because the Market Demands It”: Alternative Meat Production and the Speciesist Logic.Markus Lundström - 2019 - Agriculture and Human Values 36 (1):127-136.
The Political Economy of Meat.Markus Lundström - 2019 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (1):95-104.
“Give Me Sight Beyond Sight”: Thinking With Science Fiction as Thinking (Together) With.Alexander I. Stingl - 2016 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 36 (1):3-27.
“Whose Science? Whose Fiction?” Uncanny Echoes of Belonging in Samosata.Sabrina M. Weiss & Alexander I. Stingl - 2015 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 35 (3-4):59-66.
Similar books and articles
The Flesh of All That Is: Merleau-Ponty, Irigaray, and Julian’s ‘Showings’.Diane Antonio - 2001 - Sophia 40 (2):47-65.
The Place of Animal Being: Following Animal Embryogenesis and Navigation to the Hollow of Being in Merleau-Ponty.David Morris - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):188-218.
Flesh and Nature: Understanding Merleau-Ponty’s Relational Ontology.Bryan E. Bannon - 2011 - Research in Phenomenology 41 (3):327-357.
Ma(R)King Essence-Ecofeminism and Embodiment.Richard T. Twine - 2001 - Ethics and the Environment 6 (2):31-58.
Gesture, Landscape and Embrace: A Phenomenological Analysis of Elemental Motions.Stephen J. Smith - 2006 - Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 6 (1):1-10.
Theorizing Difference From Multiracial Feminism.Maxine Baca Zinn & Bonnie Thornton Dill - 1996 - Feminist Studies 22 (2):321-331.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-01-29
Total views
46 ( #218,512 of 2,411,471 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,366 of 2,411,471 )
2014-01-29
Total views
46 ( #218,512 of 2,411,471 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,366 of 2,411,471 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads