Thing and object

Acta Analytica 23 (1):69-89 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a fundamental ontological difference between two kinds of entity: things and objects. Unlike things, objects are not identical to any fusion of particulars. Unlike things, objects do not have mereological parts. While things are ontologically innocent, objects are not. Objects are meaty. I defend the distinction between things and objects, and provide an account of the nature of objects.

Similar books and articles

Abelard’s Assault on Everyday Objects.Andrew Arlig - 2007 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2):209-227.
Tropes and Other Things.Cynthia Macdonald - 1998 - In Stephen Laurence & Cynthia Macdonald (eds.), Contemporary Readings in the Foundations of Metaphysics. Blackwell.
9. On Locating Composite Objects.Jacek Brzozowski - 2008 - In Dean W. Zimmerman (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 4--193.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
634 (#22,904)

6 months
92 (#38,135)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kristie Miller
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

A Consideration of Project Ontology.Brian Tebbitt - 2023 - Philosophy of Management 22 (4):505-520.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity: Lectures Given to the Princeton University Philosophy Colloquium.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Edited by Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Material beings.Peter Van Inwagen - 1990 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.

View all 31 references / Add more references