Infinitesimal Differences: Controversies Between Leibniz and his Contemporaries [Book Review]

Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):527-528 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Leibniz is well known for his formulation of the infinitesimal calculus. Nevertheless, the nature and logic of his discovery are seldom questioned: does it belong more to mathematics or metaphysics, and how is it connected to his physics? This book, composed of fourteen essays, investigates the nature and foundation of the calculus, its relationship to the physics of force and principle of continuity, and its overall method and metaphysics. The Leibnizian calculus is presented in its origin and context together with its main contributors: Archimedes, Cavalieri, Wallis, Hobbes, Pascal, Huygens, Bernoulli, and Nieuwentijt. Many of us know and probably have used the Leibnizian formula: to ..

Similar books and articles

The question of Deleuze’s Neo-Leibnizianism.Simon B. Duffy - 2012 - In Patricia Pisters & Rosi Braidotti (eds.), Down by Law: Revisiting Normativity with Deleuze. Bloomsbury Academic.
The Role of Mathematics in Deleuze’s Critical Engagement with Hegel.Simon Duffy - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (4):563 – 582.
Schizo‐Math.Simon Duffy - 2004 - Angelaki 9 (3):199 – 215.
Kant's critique of the Leibnizian philosophy : Contra the Leibnizians, but pro Leibniz.Anja Jauernig - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press. pp. 41-63 (and 214-223 notes).
Leibniz on force and absolute motion.John T. Roberts - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (3):553-573.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-10-12

Downloads
357 (#54,667)

6 months
55 (#79,060)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Francoise Monnoyeur
Centre Jean Pepin - CNRS - Paris (France)

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references