Analysis 71 (4):642-645 (2011)

Authors
Abstract
I defend Pascal's Wager from a particular way of evading it, the mixed strategy approach. The mixed strategies approach suggests that Pascal's Wager does not obligate one to believe in God, because one can get the same infinite expected utility from other strategies besides the strategy of believing in God. I will show that while there's nothing technically wrong with the mixed strategy approach, rationality requires it to be applied in such a way that Pascal's Wager doesn't lose any force.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/anr092
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Waging War on Pascal’s Wager.Alan Hájek - 2003 - Philosophical Review 112 (1):27-56.
Pascal's Wager and Infinite Utilities.Antony Duff - 1986 - Analysis 46 (2):107 - 109.
Waging War on Pascal’s Wager.Alan Hájek - 2003 - Philosophical Review 112 (1):27-56.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A New Argument for Animalism.Stephan Blatti - 2012 - Analysis 72 (4):685-690.
Iterated Mixed Strategies and Pascal’s Wager.Emil Badici - 2019 - Logica Universalis 13 (4):487-494.
Pascal's Wager.Michael Rota - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (4):e12404.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Pascal's Wager.Alan Hájek - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Pascal's Wager is a Possible Bet (but Not a Very Good One): Reply to Harmon Holcomb III.Graham Oppy - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40 (2):101 - 116.
On Rescher on Pascal's Wager.Graham Oppy - 1991 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30 (3):159 - 168.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-02-17

Total views
269 ( #33,884 of 2,439,463 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #59,291 of 2,439,463 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes