Scoring Rules and Epistemic Compromise

Mind 120 (480):1053-1069 (2011)
It is commonly assumed that when we assign different credences to a proposition, a perfect compromise between our opinions simply ‘splits the difference’ between our credences. I introduce and defend an alternative account, namely that a perfect compromise maximizes the average of the expected epistemic values that we each assign to alternative credences in the disputed proposition. I compare the compromise strategy I introduce with the traditional strategy of compromising by splitting the difference, and I argue that my strategy is a reasonable characterization of epistemic compromise
Keywords disagreement  scoring rule  compromise
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzs007
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,463
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Graham Oddie (1997). Conditionalization, Cogency, and Cognitive Value. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):533-541.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
B. Beddor (2014). Process Reliabilism's Troubles with Defeat. Philosophical Quarterly 65 (259):145-159.
Sophie Horowitz (2014). Immoderately Rational. Philosophical Studies 167 (1):41-56.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
P. Jones & I. O'Flynn (2013). Can a Compromise Be Fair? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (2):115-135.
Gerald R. Winslow (1991). Integrity and Compromise in Nursing Ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (3):307-323.
Pauline Graham (1998). Saying "No" to Compromise; "Yes" to Integration. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9-10):1007-1013.
Chiara Lepora (2011). On Compromise and Being Compromised. Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (1):1-22.
Robert M. MacIver (ed.) (1972). Integrity and Compromise. Freeport, N.Y., Books for Libraries Press.
Simon Căbulea May (2011). Moral Compromise, Civic Friendship, and Political Reconciliation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5):581-602.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

132 ( #33,147 of 1,925,506 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #187,207 of 1,925,506 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.