Mind 120 (480):1053-1069 (2011)

Authors
Sarah Moss
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Abstract
It is commonly assumed that when we assign different credences to a proposition, a perfect compromise between our opinions simply ‘splits the difference’ between our credences. I introduce and defend an alternative account, namely that a perfect compromise maximizes the average of the expected epistemic values that we each assign to alternative credences in the disputed proposition. I compare the compromise strategy I introduce with the traditional strategy of compromising by splitting the difference, and I argue that my strategy is a reasonable characterization of epistemic compromise
Keywords disagreement  scoring rule  compromise
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzs007
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,141
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.
Reflection and Disagreement.Adam Elga - 2007 - Noûs 41 (3):478–502.
Peer Disagreement and Higher Order Evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2010 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press. pp. 183--217.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Immoderately Rational.Sophie Horowitz - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (1):41-56.
An Accuracy Based Approach to Higher Order Evidence.Miriam Schoenfield - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (3):690-715.
Process Reliabilism's Troubles with Defeat.Bob Beddor - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (259):145-159.

View all 32 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can a Compromise Be Fair?P. Jones & I. O'Flynn - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (2):115-135.
Integrity and Compromise in Nursing Ethics.Gerald R. Winslow - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (3):307-323.
Saying "No" to Compromise; "Yes" to Integration.Pauline Graham - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9-10):1007-1013.
Integrity and Compromise.Robert M. MacIver (ed.) - 1972 - Freeport, N.Y., Books for Libraries Press.
The Diminishing Marginal Value of Happy People.James L. Hudson - 1987 - Philosophical Studies 51 (1):123 - 137.
Moral Compromise, Civic Friendship, and Political Reconciliation.Simon Căbulea May - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5):581-602.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-10

Total views
249 ( #33,958 of 2,404,057 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #47,777 of 2,404,057 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes