In Fiorella Battaglia, Nikil Mukerji & Julian Nida-Rümelin (eds.), Rethinking Responsibility in Science and Technology. Pisa University Press. pp. 25-36 (2014)

Authors
Nikil S. Mukerji
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München
Abstract
In this essay, I will examine how technological progress affects the responsibilities of human agents. To this end, I will distinguish between two interpretations of the concept of responsibility, viz. responsibility as attributability and substantive responsibility. On the former interpretation, responsibility has to do with the idea of authorship. When we say that a person is responsible for her actions we mean that she is to be seen as the author of these actions. They can be attributed to her, such that she can be normatively appraised – i.e. blamed, praised, etc. – on that basis. In discussing this kind of responsibility I will show that the responsibility of human agents tends to increase as their technologies progress. This claim is often taken for granted, but seldom clarified and argued for. I will give it a clear interpretation and provide a semi-formal reasoning that supports it. The second interpretation of responsibility that I will discuss is substantive responsibility. It has to do with the normative demands that confront us with what we are required to do. I will argue that technological change can affect, firstly, what our substantive responsibilities are on a case-by-case basis. Secondly, I will try to show that it can affect the way we think about our substantive responsibilities at the level of theoretical normative ethics.
Keywords responsibility  technology  technological progress  attributability  substantial responsibility
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.
Responsibility, Order Ethics, and Group Agency.Nikil Mukerji & Christoph Luetge - 2014 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 100 (2):176-186.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Technological Delegation: Responsibility for the Unintended.Katinka Waelbers - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):51-68.
The Moral Responsibility of the Hospital.Richard T. De George - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1):87-100.
Justice and Responsibility.Arthur Ripstein - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 17 (2):361-386.
Is There an Ivory Tower in Reality?E. Mamchur - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):101 – 111.
Responsibility Practices and Unmanned Military Technologies.Merel Noorman - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (3):809-826.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-09-10

Total views
362 ( #22,277 of 2,426,097 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #30,114 of 2,426,097 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes