The distribution of numbers and the comprehensiveness of reasons

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (2):207–233 (2005)
Abstract
In this paper, I concentrate on two themes: to what extent numbers bear on an agent's duties, and how numbers should relate to social policy. In the first half of the paper I consider the abstract case of a choice between saving two people and saving one, and my focus is on the contrast between a duty to act and a reason which merely makes an action intelligible. In the second half, I turn to the issue of social policy and investigate how if at all numbers can have a bearing there, if there is no obvious duty on individuals to save the greater number. My proposal is that it is not the bare numbers themselves (or even the ratio of claimants on either side of the dilemma) which explain our intuitions in such cases, but rather considerations of the extent to which each of us can make a reasonable claim on others. In short, I argue: numbers don't count, people do
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.0066-7373.2004.00111.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,587
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Saving the Few.Tyler Doggett - 2013 - Noûs 47 (2):302-315.
Giving Each Person Her Due: Taurek Cases and Non-Comparative Justice.Alan Thomas - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):661-676.
Equality and Division: Values in Principle.Samuel Scheffler & Veronique Munoz-Darde - 2005 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79 (1):255–284.
The New Problem of Numbers in Morality.Fiona Woollard - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):631-641.
Comment on Munoz-Dardé's'liberty's Chains'.Niko Kolodny - 2009 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):197-212.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Should the Probabilities Count?Katharina Rasmussen - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 159 (2):205-218.
What Are Numbers?Zvonimir Šikić - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (2):159-171.
Why the Numbers Should Sometimes Count.John T. Sanders - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (1):3-14.
Taurek, Numbers and Probabilities.Rob Lawlor - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):149 - 166.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
107 ( #54,199 of 2,235,704 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #149,672 of 2,235,704 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature