The Massachusetts Health Plan, Individual Mandates, and the Neutrality of the Liberal State

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (5):466-483 (2011)
In 2007, Massachusetts instituted a universal coverage health plan that requires all citizens to purchase insurance. I argue that there is nothing wrong in principle with the use of an individual mandate to force citizens to secure health insurance. I argue that state neutrality is not tenable on this issue. Then I proceed to show that even if state neutrality were viable, it is not a violation of state neutrality (thought of as neutrality of intent) to force citizens to insure themselves with the primary purpose of securing the normative good of health. I adapt recent work on universal medical coverage to demonstrate that such a mandate is in keeping with several principles of fairness shared in liberal democratic societies. This argument not only applies to the Massachusetts plan but likely to any other health care coverage schemes using individual mandates in the US political context, including recently passed federal health care reform measures. However, even though the Massachusetts plan may provide increased access to health care for many, there are still legitimate worries that it currently places disproportionate financial burdens on the working poor and thus will need refinement
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/jhr039
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,479
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Dale Murray (2011). Monitoring Shared Health Governance. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (7):55 - 57.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Paige R. Sipes-Metzler (1994). Oregon Health Plan: Ration or Reason. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (4):305-314.
Bernard J. Mansheim (1997). What Care Should Be Covered? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):331-336.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

14 ( #313,427 of 1,925,765 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #418,414 of 1,925,765 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.