Pink Slips, Privilege, and Payback

Professional Ethics, a Multidisciplinary Journal 8 (3-4):123-180 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

10636579

DOI

10.5840/profethics200083/419

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Pink Slips, Privilege, and Payback.Lester A. Myers - 2000 - Professional Ethics, a Multidisciplinary Journal 8 (3-4):123-180.
Testing Times: In-House Counsel and Independence.Suzanne Le Mire - 2011 - Legal Ethics 14 (1):21-47.
Deontic vs. nondeontic conceptions of epistemic justification.H. Vahid - 1998 - Erkenntnis 49 (3):285-301.
Valuing Knowledge: A Deontological Approach.Christian Piller - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):413-428.
Responsible belief and epistemic justification.Rik Peels - 2017 - Synthese 194 (8):2895-2915.
Pulling together as a team : collective action and Pink Floyd's intentions.Ted Gracyk - 2007 - In George A. Reisch (ed.), Pink Floyd and Philosophy: Careful with That Axiom, Eugene! Open Court.
Slip-Proof Actions.Santiago Amaya - 2016 - In Roman Altshuler & Michael J. Sigrist (eds.), Time and the Philosophy of Action. Routledge. pp. 21-36.
Are decisions motive-perpetuating?J. Mintoff - 1999 - Analysis 59 (4):266-275.
Parliamentary privilege and the rule of law.Evan Fox-Decent - manuscript
The Argument from Slips.Santiago Amaya - 2015 - In Andrei Buckareff, Carlos Moya & Sergi Rosell (eds.), Agency, Freedom, and Moral Responsibility. pp. 13-29.
Virtue and Moral Agency.Lisa Shawn Rivera - 2001 - Dissertation, Cornell University
Keeping it in-house: Ethics in the relationship between large law firm lawyers and their corporate clients through the eyes of in-house counsel.Suzanne Le Mire & Christine Parker - 2008 - Legal Ethics 11 (2):201-229.
Self-Determination: The Ethics of Action, Volume 1.Thomas Pink - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
The Problem of Massive Deception for Justification Norms of Action.Arturs Logins - 2014 - Acta Analytica 29 (4):457-468.
Intentional action and action slips.Heinz Heckhausen & Jürgen Beckmann - 1990 - Psychological Review 97 (1):36-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
17 (#894,534)

6 months
1 (#1,512,999)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references