Sampling Assumptions in Inductive Generalization

Cognitive Science 36 (2):187-223 (2012)
Abstract
Inductive generalization, where people go beyond the data provided, is a basic cognitive capability, and it underpins theoretical accounts of learning, categorization, and decision making. To complete the inductive leap needed for generalization, people must make a key ‘‘sampling’’ assumption about how the available data were generated. Previous models have considered two extreme possibilities, known as strong and weak sampling. In strong sampling, data are assumed to have been deliberately generated as positive examples of a concept, whereas in weak sampling, data are assumed to have been generated without any restrictions. We develop a more general account of sampling that allows for an intermediate mixture of these two extremes, and we test its usefulness. In two experiments, we show that most people complete simple one-dimensional generalization tasks in a way that is consistent with their believing in some mixture of strong and weak sampling, but that there are large individual differences in the relative emphasis different people give to each type of sampling. We also show experimentally that the relative emphasis of the mixture is influenced by the structure of the available information. We discuss the psychological meaning of mixing strong and weak sampling, and possible extensions of our modeling approach to richer problems of inductive generalization
Keywords Bayesian modeling  Inductive inference  Generalization
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01212.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,781
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Base Rates and Randomness.Ranald R. Macdonald - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):778-778.
Explanation as a Guide to Induction.Roger White - 2005 - Philosophers' Imprint 5:1-29.
Hypotheses and Inductive Predictions.J. -W. Romeyn - 2004 - Synthese 141 (3):333-364.
Hypotheses and Inductive Predictions.Jan-Willem Romeijn - 2004 - Synthese 141 (3):333 - 364.
The Construction of Meaning.Walter Kintsch & Praful Mangalath - 2011 - Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2):346-370.
Added to PP index
2011-12-06

Total downloads
31 ( #171,361 of 2,198,883 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,438 of 2,198,883 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature