On remembering an unreal past

Analysis 26 (March):122-128 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Against Russell’s skeptical conjecture, that the world and its entire population came into existence five minutes ago, it is argued that any one of the following is logically incompatible with the conjunction of the other two: ostensible memories of certain events, records of such events, and the non-occurrence of these same events. This conclusion is reached through a critical examination of (1) the arguments advanced by Norman Malcolm in trying to show that Russell’s “hypothesis” does not express a logical possibility, and (2) the counterarguments by which James W. Cornman tries to show that it does.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

More on mistaken memory.James W. Cornman - 1966 - Analysis 26 (December):57-58.
Malcolm's mistaken memory.James W. Cornman - 1965 - Analysis 25 (April):161-167.
Our Knowledge of the Historical Past. [REVIEW]A. C. D. - 1973 - Review of Metaphysics 27 (1):149-150.
Tristram shandy's last page.Robin Small - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (2):213-216.
Memory.Don Locke - 1971 - Macmillan.
The age of the universe.Malcolm Acock - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (1):130-145.
Remembering events and remembering looks.Christoph Hoerl - 2014 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (3):351-372.
An argument for the logical notion of a memory trace.Deborah A. Rosen - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (March):1-10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
88 (#189,340)

6 months
5 (#837,573)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Naylor
Indiana University South Bend

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references