Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (6):619-643 (2012)

Social philosophy is a somewhat broad and imprecise term. In this article I discuss the social philosophy of Habermas, Foucault and Honneth, arguing that the latter’s work is an interesting, but not unproblematic, conception of the discipline. Following Habermas and Honneth, I argue that social philosophy should be reconstructive, but incorporate insights from Foucault. Specifically, reconstructive social philosophy can be both normative and descriptive, and at the same time establish a dialectical relationship between philosophy and the social sciences, thus fulfilling the ambition for social philosophy originally put forward by Horkheimer. The thesis I defend in this article is that reconstructive social philosophy in Habermasian or Honnethian fashion has the resources available to accomplish this ambitious task
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0191453712442143
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,194
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Richard Rorty - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
Philosophy and Real Politics.Raymond Geuss - 2008 - Princeton University Press.
Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.David M. Rasmussen - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (173):571.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
39 ( #275,277 of 2,448,335 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #450,727 of 2,448,335 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes