Synthese 190 (13):2573-2593 (2013)

Authors
Jesper Kallestrup
University of Edinburgh
Abstract
Our main aim in this paper is to contribute towards a better understanding of the epistemology of absence-based inferences. Many absence-based inferences are classified as fallacies. There are exceptions, however. We investigate what features make absence-based inferences epistemically good or reliable. In Section 2 we present Sanford Goldberg’s account of the reliability of absence-based inference, introducing the central notion of epistemic coverage. In Section 3 we approach the idea of epistemic coverage through a comparison of alethic and evidential principles. The Equivalence Schema–a well-known alethic principle–says that it is true that $p$ if and only if $p$ . We take epistemic coverage to underwrite a suitably qualified evidential analogue of the Equivalence Schema: for a high proportion of values of $p$ , subject $S$ has evidence that $p$ due to her reliance on source $S^{*}$ if and only if $p$ . We show how this evidential version of the Equivalence Schema suffices for the reliability of certain absence-based inferences. Section 4 is dedicated to exploring consequences of the Evidential Equivalence Schema. The slogan ‘absence of evidence is evidence of absence’ has received a lot of bad press. More elaborately, what has received a lot of bad press is something like the following idea: absence of evidence sufficiently good to justify belief in $p$ is evidence sufficiently good to justify belief in $\sim p$ . A striking consequence of the Evidential Equivalence Schema is that absence of evidence sufficiently good to justify belief in p is evidence sufficiently good to justify belief in $\sim p$ . We establish this claim in Section 4 and show how this supports the reliability of an additional type of absence-based inference. Section 4 immediately raises the following question: how can we make philosophically good sense of the idea that absence of evidence is evidence of absence? We address this question in Section 5. Section 6 contains some summary remarks
Keywords Fallacy of ignorance  Epistemic coverage  Absence-based inference  Absence-based belief  Sanford Goldberg  Alethic principles  Evidential principles  Absence of evidence  Evidence of absence  Reliabilism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-013-0255-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,232
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Introduction to Logic.Irving M. Copi - 1953 - Pearson/Prentice Hall.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Outsourced Cognition.Mikkel Gerken - 2014 - Philosophical Issues 24 (1):127-158.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Objective Evidence and Absence: Comment on Sober.Michael Strevens - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (1):91 - 100.
Absence of Evidence and Evidence of Absence.Klaas J. Kraay - 2007 - Faith and Philosophy 24 (2):203-228.
Absense of Evidence and Evidence of Absence.Klaas J. Kraay - 2007 - Faith and Philosophy 24 (2):203-228.
An Absence of Evidence in “Evidence-Based Rulemaking”.Jason Gerson & Steven Goodman - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):22-23.
The Ethics of Belief.Andrew Chignell - 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Rey’s Meta-Atheism.Boran Berčić - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):417-422.
Presentism and Absence Causation: An Exercise in Mimicry.Brannon McDaniel - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):323-332.
Against Absence-Dependent Thoughts.P. Noonan - 2004 - Analysis 64 (1):92-93.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-03-20

Total views
75 ( #123,057 of 2,329,878 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #582,921 of 2,329,878 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes