Discriminatory Capacities, Russell's Principle, and the Importance of Losing Sight of Objects

European Journal of Philosophy 24 (3) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What capacities for discrimination must a subject possess in order to entertain singular thoughts? Evans has suggested that a subject must be able to discriminate his referent from all other entities in order to be able to do so; what he calls Russell's Principle. Evans' view has few followers, and he has been repeatedly accused of presenting no argument in its favour. In this paper I present what I take to be Evans' argument. I suggest that he has been misinterpreted as introducing Russell's Principle for the purpose of fixing reference. Rather, he introduces it in order to ensure that our conceptual capacities have the functional complexity to allow for objective thought. I suggest that the logical types of our thought are constituted by their inferential potential and argue that, even though singular thought may be possible without the satisfaction of Russell's Principle, singular thought that forms part of an objective world view is not.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-24

Downloads
25 (#620,814)

6 months
8 (#506,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Johan Gersel
University of Copenhagen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The reference book.John Hawthorne & David Manley - 2012 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by David Manley.
Making it Explicit.Isaac Levi & Robert B. Brandom - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):145.
On being in the same place at the same time.David Wiggins - 1968 - Philosophical Review 77 (1):90-95.
Collected Papers.Colin McGinn - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (2):278.
Is sense transparent?John Campbell - 1988 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 88:273-292.

View all 13 references / Add more references