Epistemic Foundations of Political Liberalism

Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (5):598-620 (2013)

Authors
Fabienne Peter
University of Warwick
Abstract
At the core of political liberalism is the claim that political institutions must be publicly justified or justifiable to be legitimate. What explains the significance of public justification? The main argument that defenders of political liberalism present is an argument from disagreement: the irreducible pluralism that is characteristic of democratic societies requires a mode of justification that lies in between a narrowly political solution based on actual acceptance and a traditional moral solution based on justification from the third-person perspective. But why should we take disagreements seriously? This – epistemic question – has not received the attention it deserves so far. I argue that the significance of public justification can be explained through the possibility of reasonable disagreement. In a reasonable disagreement, the parties hold mutually incompatible beliefs, but each is justified to hold the belief they do. I shall use the notion of a reasonable disagreement to explain the possibility of an irreducible pluralism of moral and religious doctrines and, on that basis, why the justification of political institutions has to be public.
Keywords public justification  disagreement  Rawls
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2013
DOI 10.1163/17455243-4681033
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Disagreement, Asymmetry, and Liberal Legitimacy.Jonathan Quong - 2005 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (3):301-330.
Toleration as Sedition.Glen Newey - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (3):363-384.
The Completeness of Public Reason.Micah Schwartzman - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):191-220.
What is Reasonableness?James Boettcher - 2004 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (5-6):597-621.
Political Liberalism, the Internal Conception, and the Problem of Public Dogma.Thomas M. Besch - 2012 - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche 2 (1):153-177.
The Ethics of Reasoning From Conjecture.Micah Schwartzman - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (4):521-544.
The Democratic Ideology of Right–Left and Public Reason in Relation to Rawls's Political Liberalism.Torben Bech Dyrberg - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (2):161-176.
“Political, Not Metaphysical”.James W. Boettcher - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:205-219.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-10-13

Total views
772 ( #4,558 of 2,286,543 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
83 ( #8,379 of 2,286,543 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature